dpb <none@non.net> wrote in message <kjuger$mqe$1@speranza.aioe.org>...
> On 4/8/2013 8:22 AM, zack00 wrote:
>
> Probably better than actually shifting columns would be to simply keep a
> pointer to the next column to use modulo Ncols instead.
>
Why it is better?
Whereas the array is rearranged later with modulo, or at the begining without, the data in the memory get moved by the same amount.
Bruno
> On 4/8/2013 8:22 AM, zack00 wrote:
>
> Probably better than actually shifting columns would be to simply keep a
> pointer to the next column to use modulo Ncols instead.
>
Why it is better?
Whereas the array is rearranged later with modulo, or at the begining without, the data in the memory get moved by the same amount.
Bruno