On 10/15/2012 5:02 AM, Jason wrote:
...
> To follow up on this, the following shows the specifications of my
> computers:
> The one with R2010b:
> Xeon X5680 @ 3.33GHz, RAM 24GB, Win7 Professional
> The other with R2011b (sorry, I thought it was R2012a)
> i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz, RAM 8GB, Win7 Enterprise
> Still, the latter runs more than 1.5 times faster than the former....
32- or 64-bit, cache sizes/speeds, memory bus spec's, i/o, etc., etc.,
etc., ...
It's essentially nothing of the "spec's" that can matter even w/o
addressing what's different between the two releases of Matlab...
--![]()
...
> To follow up on this, the following shows the specifications of my
> computers:
> The one with R2010b:
> Xeon X5680 @ 3.33GHz, RAM 24GB, Win7 Professional
> The other with R2011b (sorry, I thought it was R2012a)
> i5-2500 @ 3.30GHz, RAM 8GB, Win7 Enterprise
> Still, the latter runs more than 1.5 times faster than the former....
32- or 64-bit, cache sizes/speeds, memory bus spec's, i/o, etc., etc.,
etc., ...
It's essentially nothing of the "spec's" that can matter even w/o
addressing what's different between the two releases of Matlab...
--